Compliance Reviewer

LOC proves the work happened. Compliance Reviewer proves it was done right.

Trained AI QA agents read the photo evidence your crews submit and check it against your acceptance checklist, field by field: right equipment, right label, right reinstatement. Every install gets reviewed, not a sample, and verdicts land in seconds with the reasoning in writing.

CR Compliance Reviewer AI QUALITY CONTROL Home Stats Insights Training Agents Users Vendors Job ID: 4471 8823 Submission: Aerial Export Re-run Agent Result: PASS Pass: 7 | Fail: 1 1 non-required failed Vendor: Subcontractor: Technician: Submitted: 7/21 · 5:23 PM Strand AttachmentChecker Cable LashingChecker Splice ClosureChecker Asset TagChecker Ground ClearanceChecker ASSET TAG LEGIBLE 12:45 PM · 07/21/2026 GPS VERIFIED Download PHOTO 2/6 Feedback: Add a comment... Agree Disagree Submit Re-run compliance review with your feedback Feedback History Agreed with Agent decision Agent Rationale: Closure secured and lashed to the strand, connectors seated, and the asset tag legible in frame. Confidence: 89% AGENT VERSION V1.2-REVIEW · REVIEWED 07/22/2026 05:24
The review screen. Recreated from the live product with representative data; customer details withheld

The problem

Thousands of install photos. Who is actually checking them?

Every operator runs its own QA standard, and every build partner submits evidence against it: thousands of photos a week across aerial, buried, no-access and frozen-ground installs. Manual review cannot keep pace with that queue, so most programs check a sample.

That means a low percentage of the work ever gets reviewed. The rest ships on trust, and the problems the sample missed come back later as rework, disputes and fault tickets, when the crew is long gone and the trench is closed.

Compliance Reviewer reviews every submission. QA agents trained to your standards do the first pass on every photo, your reviewers keep control of the verdicts, and vendors get a clear, disputable reason instead of a black-box rejection.

THE QA QUEUE · THIS WEEK 1,000s IN / WEEK UNCHECKED REVIEWED: THE SAMPLE Everything else ships on trust. The queue never empties. Sampling was never the standard, it was the compromise. ILLUSTRATIVE
The photo queue nobody has time to check

How it works

From the crew's phone to the vendor scorecard.

  1. You set the standard

    Configure the photos every install must include and the pass criteria for each field. Your checklist, not a template.

  2. Crew submits the evidence

    Crews capture the required photo set in the field; incomplete submissions do not slip through.

  3. Agents check every field

    QA agents trained to your standards review every photo. Screenshots, duplicates and re-used photos get caught and reported to you.

  4. Verdicts with reasons

    Pass, fail or flag in seconds, rationale in writing. Your reviewers override, vendors can dispute.

  5. Patterns become action

    Scorecards, coaching notices and trends by vendor, state and field.

Trained to your standards, not ours

  • You define the required photo set and the acceptance criteria for every install type. Checklists are configuration, not development.
  • The agents are trained against your standards and recalibrated with your reviewers' feedback: agree, disagree, re-run the review.
  • Four installation types out of the box: aerial, buried, no-access and frozen ground. Pass rules configurable per vendor.

What you get out

Operational output, not just verdicts.

  • Vendor performance scorecards, generated automatically from real submission data: who fails what, where, and which way it is trending.
  • Coaching notices that put what the crew submitted next to what the standard requires, with practical notes they can act on.
  • Integrity reports: screenshots, duplicates and re-used photos, flagged and reported the moment they appear.
  • A reviewable record for every install, with verdict, rationale and evidence kept together.

Where it fits

  • A standalone quality-control platform for FTTH field installations, powered by trained AI QA agents. It runs on its own today.
  • Integrating with LOC as a module, so evidence captured at the asset will flow straight into review.
  • Built for the people who own acceptance: quality teams, vendor managers and build supervisors.
COACHING NOTICE · YARD RESTORATION & COMPACTION SUBMITTED Loose spoil, cable exposed at grade REQUIRED Backfill compacted, marker visible PRACTICAL NOTES FOR THE CREW 1. Compact the backfill level with grade before photographing. 2. Leave the cable marker visible at the surface. 3. Retake from six feet back so the full reinstatement is in frame. SENT AUTOMATICALLY WHEN THE SAME FIELD KEEPS FAILING ILLUSTRATIVE
What the crew did, next to what the standard requires
FIRST-PASS RATE · BY VENDOR · LAST 90 DAYS VENDOR A 94% VENDOR B 88% VENDOR C 81% VENDOR D 62% VENDOR D TREND SINCE COACHING: +6 PTS ILLUSTRATIVE
Who fails what, where, and which way it is trending

The accountability layer

Sampling was a compromise with manual review. When every install can be checked, the sample stops being the standard.

See Compliance Reviewer run against your own acceptance checklist.

Book a demo